I suppose if you’re writing a book about wasting time, empty spaces, messing around and doing nothing at all it goes without saying that you need to waste time, gaze into space, mess about and do nothing at all. I spent most of my day today watching ants.
So it’s not just me then? The world seems to be increasingly run my tyrants and fools. But the triumph of bad people over good is the real kick in the guts. I know it’s only a phase (probably) but even so. I couldn’t agree more about the media. They just make things worse.
I’ve almost finished writing my piece on what AI cannot do. In the meantime, I’ve had a thought. The real problem, surely, isn’t making machines behave ethically. The bigger problem is making humans do so.
The key argument in favour of autonomous vehicles, such as driverless cars, is generally that they will be safer. In short, computers make better decisions than people and less people will be killed on the world’s roads if we remove human control. Meanwhile, armed robots on the battlefield are widely seen as a very bad idea, especially if these robots are autonomous and make life or death decisions unaided by human intervention. Isn’t this a double standard? Why can we delegate life or death decisions to a car, but not to a robot in a conflict zone?
You might argue that killer robots are designed to kill people, whereas driverless cars are not, but should such a distinction matter? In reality it might be that driverless cars kill far more people by accident than killer robots, because there are so many more of these machines. If we allow driverless vehicles to make instant life of death decisions surely, we must allow the same for military robots? And why not extend the idea to armed police robots too? Same logic.
My own view is that no machine should be given the capacity to make life or death decisions involving humans. AI is smart, and getting smarter, but no AI is even close to being able to understand the complexities, nuances or contradictions that can arise in any given situation.
If you are wondering why privacy matters, here’s a great summary by Daniel Solove, A Professor at GW Law School. I hope he won’t mind me copying this here.
1. Limit on
Power
Privacy is a
limit on government power, as well as the power of private sector companies.
The more someone knows about us, the more power they can have over us. Personal
data is used to make very important decisions in our lives. Personal data can
be used to affect our reputations; and it can be used to influence our
decisions and shape our behavior. It can be used as a tool to exercise control
over us. And in the wrong hands, personal data can be used to cause us great
harm.
2. Respect for
Individuals
Privacy is
about respecting individuals. If a person has a reasonable desire to keep
something private, it is disrespectful to ignore that person’s wishes without a
compelling reason to do so. Of course, the desire for privacy can conflict with
important values, so privacy may not always win out in the balance. Sometimes
people’s desires for privacy are just brushed aside because of a view that the
harm in doing so is trivial. Even if this doesn’t cause major injury, it
demonstrates a lack of respect for that person. In a sense it is saying: “I
care about my interests, but I don’t care about yours.”
3. Reputation
Management
Privacy
enables people to manage their reputations. How we are judged by others affects
our opportunities, friendships, and overall well-being. Although we can’t have
complete control over our reputations, we must have some ability to protect our
reputations from being unfairly harmed. Protecting reputation depends on
protecting against not only falsehoods but also certain truths. Knowing private
details about people’s lives doesn’t necessarily lead to more accurate judgment
about people. People judge badly, they judge in haste, they judge out of
context, they judge without hearing the whole story, and they judge with
hypocrisy. Privacy helps people protect themselves from these troublesome
judgments.
4. Maintaining
Appropriate Social Boundaries
People
establish boundaries from others in society. These boundaries are both physical
and informational. We need places of solitude to retreat to, places where we
are free of the gaze of others in order to relax and feel at ease. We also
establish informational boundaries, and we have an elaborate set of these
boundaries for the many different relationships we have. Privacy helps people
manage these boundaries. Breaches of these boundaries can create awkward social
situations and damage our relationships. Privacy is also helpful to reduce the
social friction we encounter in life. Most people don’t want everybody to know
everything about them – hence the phrase “none of your business.” And sometimes
we don’t want to know everything about other people — hence the phrase “too
much information.”
5. Trust
In
relationships, whether personal, professional, governmental, or commercial, we
depend upon trusting the other party. Breaches of confidentiality are breaches
of that trust. In professional relationships such as our relationships with
doctors and lawyers, this trust is key to maintaining candor in the
relationship. Likewise, we trust other people we interact with as well as the
companies we do business with. When trust is breached in one relationship, that
could make us more reluctant to trust in other relationships.
6. Control
Over One’s Life
Personal data
is essential to so many decisions made about us, from whether we get a loan, a
license or a job to our personal and professional reputations. Personal data is
used to determine whether we are investigated by the government, or searched at
the airport, or denied the ability to fly. Indeed, personal data affects nearly
everything, including what messages and content we see on the Internet. Without
having knowledge of what data is being used, how it is being used, the ability
to correct and amend it, we are virtually helpless in today’s world. Moreover,
we are helpless without the ability to have a say in how our data is used or
the ability to object and have legitimate grievances be heard when data uses
can harm us. One of the hallmarks of freedom is having autonomy and control
over our lives, and we can’t have that if so many important decisions about us
are being made in secret without our awareness or participation.
7. Freedom of
Thought and Speech
Privacy is key
to freedom of thought. A watchful eye over everything we read or watch can
chill us from exploring ideas outside the mainstream. Privacy is also key to
protecting speaking unpopular messages. And privacy doesn’t just protect fringe
activities. We may want to criticize people we know to others yet not share
that criticism with the world. A person might want to explore ideas that their
family or friends or colleagues dislike.
8. Freedom of
Social and Political Activities
Privacy helps
protect our ability to associate with other people and engage in political
activity. A key component of freedom of political association is the ability to
do so with privacy if one chooses. We protect privacy at the ballot because of
the concern that failing to do so would chill people’s voting their true
conscience. Privacy of the associations and activities that lead up to going to
the voting booth matters as well, because this is how we form and discuss our
political beliefs. The watchful eye can disrupt and unduly influence these
activities.
9. Ability to
Change and Have Second Chances
Many people
are not static; they change and grow throughout their lives. There is a great
value in the ability to have a second chance, to be able to move beyond a
mistake, to be able to reinvent oneself. Privacy nurtures this ability. It
allows people to grow and mature without being shackled with all the foolish
things they might have done in the past. Certainly, not all misdeeds should be
shielded, but some should be, because we want to encourage and facilitate
growth and improvement.
10. Not Having
to Explain or Justify Oneself
An important reason why privacy matters is not having to explain or justify oneself. We may do a lot of things which, if judged from afar by others lacking complete knowledge or understanding, may seem odd or embarrassing or worse. It can be a heavy burden if we constantly have to wonder how everything we do will be perceived by others and have to be at the ready to explain ourselves.
Daniel J.
Solove is the John Marshall Harlan Research Professor of Law at George
Washington University Law School, the founder of TeachPrivacy, a
privacy/data security training company, and a Senior Policy Advisor at Hogan
Lovells.
My joke 3 years ago that the EU might fall apart before Britain had left is starting to look semi-serious. I do believe that the world, especially Europe and the US, is one shock away from a major meltdown. This could be triggered by a a major political or economic event or triggered by irrational emotional contagion. Fasten your seat belts folks, the ride is about to get bumpy.
I’m not really a podcast kinda guy, but I do think this is rather good. It’s a podcast series about people that work with dead people. Dead serious. Dead Honest.com