Could Death Ever Be The New Sex?

Screen Shot 2014-02-04 at 09.44.34

Here’s a weird one – or perhaps not. Back in Victorian times death was a popular subject of conversation. How things have changed. Death is now sanitised and practically invisible, as opposed to sex, which seems to be everywhere. But things might be slowly changing again, especially with the rapid ageing of most Western nations, which would presumably create more of an interest in death and dying and less of an interest in sex. Enter Death Cafes. The Death Cafe movement started around 2011 and has already spread to the US. The idea consists of people sitting down to drink tea and coffee, eat cake and discuss death. Sounds creepy, but why not?

http://deathcafe.com/

Formulae for future conflict

Some time ago I wrote about a formula that might predict future revolutions (essentially the number of men aged 16-24 in a population x the level of education x internet access x level of corruption/ bureaucracy/censorship x food prices x unemployment).

Anyway, a new formula has come my way via the magazine Nature, which is said to predict similar forms of conflict. The basic idea is that a hidden order underlies any conflict with the exception of conflicts that involve two sides of similar strength. The study, by Neil Johnson and colleagues at the University of Miami, says that time interval between attacks remains relatively constant, which allows for intervention.

What’s Next issue 34

Screen Shot 2014-01-29 at 17.24.51

 

…is finally up. The link is right here.

Regular readers might notice that the nowandnext website has had a bit of a refresh too. The site is now more mobile and iPad friendly and hopefully cleaner too (it was never exactly cluttered but it’s now super simple). Hope you enjoy it.

Now…finding the time to do brainmail.

R.

Could the BRIC wall fall?

Screen shot 2014-01-28 at 09.03.44

 

Will the world really look like the chart above in 2050?

One funny thing about predictions is that once someone has made a definitive pronouncement, events often conspire to move things in the opposite direction.

Jim O’Neill, Chief Economist of Goldman Sachs, coined the acronym ‘BRICs’ in a briefing paper issued in London on November 30, 2001. The briefing (Building Better Economic BRICs) described how Brazil, Russia, India and China, all chosen on the basis of population, economic development and attitudes towards globalization, were reshaping the world in terms of economic power. The briefing note also boldly predicted that by 2041 (then revised to 2039) these nations would eclipse the six largest Western nations with regard to economic output. In other words, Russia, Brazil, India and China would soon reshape the world, not only in terms of money, but also in terms of influence and ideas.

Following on from the BRICs we’ve had the Next Eleven countries and now the MINTs (Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey). But like the BRICs, most if not all of these countries suffer from some fairly fundamental issues relating to governance and corruption, which could bring some or all of them crashing down.

China, arguably, has a building bubble in the making, its financial system is suspect (shades of the Japanese banking system prior to their ‘lost decade’), water is an issue, they are running out of low-cost rural migrants, the country is ageing rapidly and the imbalance of young males in China’s population could cause trouble if economic growth slows and unemployment starts to rise. Meanwhile, Russia is a tinderbox politically and Brazil’s prospects seem to rise and fall all the time depending upon the latest economic numbers and the whims of newspaper and magazine editors. This leaves India, where infrastructure is being pushed to its physical limits and where corruption is endemic.

This leaves the USA in an interesting position. The US is far more resilient than most people realize, thanks to a mix of favorable demographics (a high fertility rate plus a ‘can do’ attitude towards immigration) and cultural factors that include the American Dream and some highly positive attitudes towards innovators and early stage venture capital.

Add all this up and what we might find is that while the BRICs, N11 and MINTs all grow in importance, it will be the US that remains dominant out to 2050.

 

Image source: IMF/Citibank

The writing is on the wall for my new book

IMG_1743

 

In the beginning was the word and the word was good. I’ve more or less worked out the structure for my new book (a sequel to Future Files essentially). I’ve also got a great opening sentence, but the name of the book is eluding me. Here is my list of possible book titles. Any comments anybody?

Future Files 2: Are we nearly there yet?

Predicting the Twenty-First Century

More or Less Human

Future History

Future Now

Next

All Our Futures

The Way We Live Now

The Future (if people still matter)