Couple of quotes

“Facebook is amazing because it feels like you are doing something and you’re not doing anything. It’s the absence of doing something, but you feel gratified anyway” – Sam Crocker, American Student, quoted in the New York Times.

“ I daresay it manages to connect with a large number of people, but I strongly resent the time it takes up. In the little time that I have ‘spare’, I don’t want to sit tapping at a keyboard and staring at a screen, I want to read and think”. – Author Philip Pullman quoted in Prospect magazine

What if the Internet Disappeared?

What would happen if the internet disappeared tomorrow? Would we really care? They’d be panic initially, of course. But would anything of real substance disappear? People would initially argue that they couldn’t “do anything.” Commerce, democracy and liberty itself would then be said to be under threat.

Personally, I think that life would eventually go on much as it did before. The internet is a wonderful thing, but most of its power comes from a mixture of convenience and efficiency and the downside is that human relationships are being fragmented and demeaned.
There’s also the argument, eloquently outlined by Jaron Lanier, that Web 2.0 is really nothing more than endlessly reheated and rehashed content and that friendships found online are “fake”. They are “bait laid by the lords of the clouds to lure hypothetical advertisers.”

As for the wisdom of crowds, forget it. Yes, a network can solve local ‘weak tie’ problems, such as where to find a good dry cleaner. Large numbers of people are also good at solving simple problems or filtering ideas, but most Web 2.0 content is vapid, mawkish, puerile and of no enduring significance. And yes, that includes this blog.

Internet privacy & security

Here’s a saltatory reminder about why you should be careful about what you post online. Adam Savage is a host of the TV series “Myth Busters.” One day he innocently decided to post a picture of his new Toyota outside his house via Twitter. Unfortunately, what he didn’t realise was that embedded in the picture was a geotag giving the exact location of where the picture had been taken (i.e. his house). To make matters worse Mr Savage then posted a comment alongside the picture that said, “Now it’s off to work” (i.e. There’s nobody home right now so fell free to rob me).

The problem, of course, is that few people even realise this is possible. But if you take an image with a GPS enabled mobile phone (i.e. most phones) the geotag is automatically set unless you dig down into an invisible menu and turn the functionality off. Not all websites allow geotags (Match.com, for example, disables such information – quite rightly) but many do allow it. Personally, I’d recommend that geotags be turned off. After all, all it takes is someone with basic computer coding skills to create a program that looks for photos accompanied by text such as “Going on holiday” to create a Google map of where people are – or aren’t.

In a similar vein, here’s something to put you off online banking forever.
A little while ago someone called Roger Mildenhall got a phone call saying that one of his houses had been sold and that contracts were about to be exchanged on another. This was slightly odd because Mr Mildenhall wasn’t selling either of his properties, especially the one he was still living in.

What eventually emerged was that a couple of Nigerian cyber criminals had stolen his digital identity and used this to get hold of the title deeds to his two homes. The proceeds from the sale of the first had been electronically transferred to a bank in China and thereafter laundered to nobody is quite sure where. Moral: Be very careful what you reveal online.

Chinese inflation and UK attention

Couple of things from the recent papers.

1. A study in the UK says that the average office worker looks at his/her email at least 30 times every hour. (So what about social networks and texts?)

2. New mothers spend 90 mins a day on line in the UK. (Is that all?).

3. A report by the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) says that RBS clients should hedge against a sovereign debt default…by China. The concern here, and it’s a concern I’ve been talking about for a while, is that the leadership “will have to puncture the credit bubble before it reaches levels that threaten social stability.” Inflation is currently running just below 5% in China but for some food items it’s hitting 20%. Anyone in China care to comment?

BTW, thanks to Matthew for this last one. I missed the article despite reading the paper this morning. Probably spending too long also looking at email!

Does scarcity impact attention?

Interesting though from Wendy, a friend of mine. Twenty years ago the TV news was on at set times. Roughly 6.00pm and 9.00pm. As a result we were somewhat forced to pay attention. Now news is instantly available anytime, anywhere, and as a result our attention is diluted. Assume for a second that this is true. Where does this go?

Why parents need to unfriend their children

A study by a company called JCA, which runs school trips and outdoor adventure centres (i.e. has a vested interest in keeping kids away from computers and mobile devices) says that the use of social networking sites is leading to shorter attention spans in class and is making it harder for kids to concentrate or get good grades. The report also claims that parents are finding it harder to get kids to spend time at home alone studying because they would prefer to be interacting with friends on Facebook or Twitter.

The study, based on a poll of 500 teachers, also says that “rather than relying on life experiences, educational travel and face-to-face interaction with others, children are becoming obsessed with social networking sites.” Really? I would never have imagined this was happening? Do we really need another study to spell this out?

Moreover, where are the parents? Where are the boundaries? Yes, you can blame technology for this but ultimately it’s parents that are responsible. They could restrict access. They could insist on homework being done. They could stop trying to be “best friends” with their kids and start being parents.

Equally, schools could take stronger measures to ensure that mobiles aren’t sneaked into school or used on school premises. They could also impose stronger penalties for kids that don’t do as they are told at school.

What I would agree with is that these things aren’t as easy as they sound. The peer pressure to be on such sites is immense. As Kairen Cullen, as educational psychologist says: “non-participation (on social networks) can result in feeling excluded or even socially excluded.” Then again, we probably shouldn’t listen to any adult, especially  psychologists, called “Kairen.”

Too Much Information? – Take a Nap

Research by Matthew Walker at the University of California (Berkeley) says that the best way to absorb new information after lunch is to take a mid-day siesta. Apparently the hippocampus, the area of our brains that stores new material, can fill up fast during the course of a long day, especially if we are being assaulted by digital trivia all day.

But taking a nap allows the brain to move information into the pre-frontal cortex for long-tern storage, thereby freeing up more space for incoming data. Another example, perhaps, of how the future is the past.

Facebook Finish

An interesting data visualization from David McCandless showing when people break up via Facebook status updates.

Out-takes. 1) Lots of people break up before Spring Break and the summer, 2). Lots of people start the week by dumping their other half, 3) Most people have the common decency not to dump their partners on Christmas day.