The benefits of not thinking

What’s in my head? Not a lot, which is underrated.

The last Greek hotel I stayed in was huge and somehow rather frenetic. Perhaps it was the constant wind. Most of the hotel guests – a party-mix of well fed Americans and Europeans, along with a number of freshly-minted Russians – were glued to various mobile devices and were not settled. They were all physically there, but none of them, it seemed, were mentally present. They appeared to be scanning the cyber-horizon to see whether something more interesting was happening elsewhere. They certainly seemed incapable of letting go. Mild frustration mixed with disappointment seemed the dominant theme.

Contrast this with where I am now – a 15-minute flight away. The pace is glacial, if that’s not oxymoronic for a volcanic island. The wind has more or less disappeared and it’s stillness that now dominates. People are sitting, looking outwards. But this outer gaze inevitably turns inwards. People end up looking at things with their hearts.

Why would this be so? I think the reason is the view.

I’m in a tiny hotel (14 rooms) overlooking an extinct volcano that last erupted several thousand years ago. The crater is about 14 kilometres across and is filled with very deep, and hence very still, water. The view is uplifting. It’s partly the distance, but you should never confuse a long distance with a good view. What is happening is that people are looking at is themselves reflected in the water.

The mobile devices that were so ubiquitous a few days ago have largely disappeared and people appear to be contemplating both their immediate past and their more distant future. It seems impossible for any thinking person not to be seduced. I suspect that this is due to several thousand years of human history mixing with a geological event of such intensity that all human accomplishment is meaningless.

It reminds me slightly of a conversation I had watching a cricket match a few months ago. I was talking with someone about what I liked about Europe and said that the age of things, especially some of the buildings, left me feeling hugely connected with everything historically. But that simultaneously it meant feeling totally insignificant. Bizarrely, both felt rather empowering.

This place is much the same. The age of the surroundings, together with the raw potential of nature, makes you feel simultaneously connected and disconnected. You feel like stardust one minute and personal assistant to Zeus the next. Thinking is elevated. Minutiae disappear, replaced by substance.

In my experience you can connect with this kind of thinking almost anywhere, bit to do so one has to first do absolutely nothing. It is only with disconnection and letting go that one can arrive at this destination. It is only by sitting quietly, looking outwards, that one can start to see what really maters.

 

Quote + rant

Here’s a quote you may like. I’ve spent most of the day planting box hedging, largely because it’s deeply satisfying, unlike my ‘new’ (it’s a 3) iPhone, which has become so annoying that I’ve given up trying to fix it.

I’m thinking of getting a nice metal hammer and smashing the s**t out of it. The battery life is equivalent to the lunchtime nap of a Mayfly and it’s latest little quirk is telling me that I don’t have enough credit to use data. I’m supposed to call 4444 to sort this out, but for some reason the ‘dismiss’ button is being dismissive and won’t f**ck off when I press it. It’s a good job I’m not having a heart attack and really need to use my f***ing phone.

BTW, my really old phone is doing just fine and seems to last a week with a single charge. Mind you, it’s somehow switched predictive texting off and refuses to let me change it back, which makes writing rather laborious, and one day last week suddenly switched to French without warning. Quelle surprise!

Oh, the quote…

“Entrepreneurs are congenitally wired to be too early. And being too early is a bigger problem than not being correct.”
– Marc Andreessen, Co-founder of Netscape
.

Smart books, lost dogs and no man’s land

It is still holiday time so don’t expect too much here. Today I’m doing some final comments on one of my books, Future Vision, and trying to work out how the dog got out of the garden over the weekend – and walked 20-minutes up the road to the pub by himself. I assume we have a hole in the fence somewhere.

Two things that have caught my eye over the last few days. The first is a snippet in the Shaping Tomorrow newsletter about self-organising textbooks. If you don’t know about Shaping Tomorrow it’s worth checking out – www.shapingtomorrow.com

The second snippet came via Corrina in Oz (a regular What’s Next contributor) who spotted a story about a women-only city planned in Saudi Arabia. Full story here.

The Future for Kids

My son’s website idea, the future for kids, is finally up and seems to be working.
Not much content on the site yet, but it’s only been live for about an hour. If you have or know any kids, ideally aged 8-13, please ask them to submit some ideas.

The idea, if you remember, was to create a site where kids could share their ideas about what the future – the world they’ll one day live in – will be like.

Submissions can be words, drawings, photographs, videos or almost anything. We’ll add tags soon so people will be able to look at ideas by category – i.e. kids (and adults too) will be able to search future cars, future fashion, future sports and so on.

That link again….

Sport and technology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A nice download here from Atos about the use of technology in sport (thanks Francisco). On a slightly related note, the latest argument over the school holidays is whether we should have 2 TVs in 2 different rooms so that each kid can watch their own programme. I said no.

One of the key problems with communal devices becoming individualized is that people get what they want. Nothing wrong with that you might think, especially if you don’t have kids, but my worry is creating a generation that cannot share or accommodate the views of others. Tough love baby.

Coming breakthroughs in science

Earlier in the year Science Focus asked 12 scientists to make a few brave predictions. Among the highlights were: use of remote sensing technology in archaeology, developments in quantum biology, finding out what colours the dinosaurs were, developments with Graphene (a one-atom thick sheet of carbon), the use of quasi-crystals to create hard-wearing materials and computer and device interfaces where individual human thoughts can be linked with individual machine actions.

A medieval future?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I’m becoming increasingly interested in the idea of neo-feudalism. This came up in a recent MOD workshop and was also the subject of a comment made by Krista in relation to my recent post concerning the world in 2045.

What is neo-feudalism? I’m still trying to figure this out, but it seems to be the idea that modern society is reverting to a feudal structure as typified by life in the middle and late medieval period.

Classically, such a world would display a high level of polarization between the incomes and opportunities at the very top of society and everyone else. This characteristic also came up a few days ago on Radio 4, although unfortunately I was driving and couldn’t write down what was actually said. Anyone else got any thoughts on this?

For a fuller definition see hear.