Interesting article in the Nikkei Weekly (Japan) about a University of Tokyo Professor, Toru Nishigaki, who claims that the collapse of Lehman Brothers can be attributed to an over reliance of logical left brain thinking. In other words, we have created a society that puts too much trust in computers and mathematical models over and above human intuition and experience.
To quote the Prof: “We are excited about the digital age that has just begun :but we haven’t learned how to deal with IT. Since the digital left-brain field has expanded rapidly, the right-brain field has been neglected, and various problems have arisen.”
I couldn’t agree more. Moreover, I think this over-reliance on machines and machine-like thinking is going to cause even more problems in the future (e.g Flight safety critical software). The other thing that he says, which I personally find fascinating, is that it is only really the right side of the brain that has the ability to connect with things that bring about true happiness.
PS – Possible linkage here with Susan Greenfield who said that the GFC was partly caused by sensation seeking young men who failed to appreciate real risk due to a diet of screen based entertainment in which a re-set button could always be used (i.e. the link being the digital era causing unforeseen problems).
The article is actually rather old (I have a back-log of reading!)
Ref: Nikkei Weekly, 2 Nov 2010, ‘Left Brain Crisis by Sumikazu Asakawa.
The collapse of ‘financial institutions’ is about thieving scumbags and massive rorts. I’m sure the people who were paid millions in the time before it ‘collapsed’ could give two figs about the company itself. Who cares about a company?
you once wrote about the skyline of the city. Here are a couple of pictures that can be useful
past http://metkere.com/images/Worlds_tallest_buildings%2C_1884.jpg
future http://metkere.com/assets_c/2010/01/tallest2010.html
I like the way you think hupovoy! Don’t these 2 images just say it all!!!
I’m impressed that you are calling an article from nov. 2010 rather old. I know you are some sort of futurologist, but I don’t think the article has been published yet… 🙂
Good one! – 2009 obviously